Tracheotomy in children older than two years: Analysis of discharge trends from 2015 to 2020.

OBJECTIVE: In light of increasingly complex patients being discharged with tracheostomies, we aimed to evaluate discharge trends over time in pediatric tracheotomy patients. We hypothesized that there would be delays in discharge from increased focus on preparing families for at-home care of critically ill pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of pediatric patients who underwent tracheotomy (Current Procedural Terminology code 31600) between 2015 and 2020 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database (ACS NSQIP-P). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative factors, postoperative complications, and discharge information. Data were analyzed using Stata 15. RESULTS: A total of 1552 patients were identified. There were 868 (56 %) males and 684 (44 %) females with a mean age of 7.3 ± 5.7 years. At least one comorbidity was seen in 1282 (83 %) patients, with 907 (58 %) having impaired cognitive status or developmental delay. Thirty-six (2.3 %) patients experienced mortality within 30 days, while 710 (46 %) were still in the hospital at 30 days. The odds of remaining in the hospital after 30 days were positively correlated with the year (p=.001). Other factors associated with an increased likelihood of remaining in the hospital after 30 days included younger patient age (p <.001), any complication (p <.001), and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p <.001). CONCLUSION: As years have progressed, fewer children were discharged from the hospital after 30 days following tracheotomy. Further research may identify socioeconomic factors contributing to the increasing length of hospital stays associated with a need for tracheotomy.

The Importance of Research Experience With a Scoreless Step 1: A Student Survey at a Community-Based Medical School.

PURPOSE: As of January 26, 2022, the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USLME) step 1 exam went from a scored test to pass-fail step 1 (PFS1). The authors were interested in surveying medical students at a community-based medical school to observe their perceptions of the importance of student research given this recent change. METHOD: A Qualtrics survey was disseminated to medical students (years 1-4) via school emails. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test to assess Likert scale scores, and narrative comments were grouped as qualitative feedback. Survey dissemination and analysis of data were both conducted at a large community-based medical school. RESULTS: The survey sampled 104 students categorized into pre-clerkship (PC) and clerkship (CL) years, with a response rate of 33%. A contradiction was found, as indicated by the higher number (p = 0.047) of clerkship students interested in Primary Care/Family medicine residency compared to pre-clerkship students at 41% and 59%, respectively. Whereas participants who indicated they are interested in pursuing a competitive specialty for residency were 51% of pre-clerkship students over 41% of clerkship students (p = 0.047). Additionally, given the assessment change to pass/fail, students did in fact believe that residencies would now view research as a higher assessed component than before (79% pre-clerkship and 72% clerkship). However, a minority of students said that they increased their research efforts (41% and 47%). Most students supported the research opportunity improvements proposed in our survey. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to make the step 1 exam pass/fail may have alleviated some stress related to performance but may have increased the perception of the importance of other components in a student's residency application. Our survey highlights how medical students at a community-based medical school perceive this change and how it has affected their research efforts.